Tag Archives: bachelor of science

Evolution or revolution: how might the Bachelor of Science change the future?

Image: A vision of the future of Macquarie University, as itputs the finishing touches on its new Engineering and Australian Astronomical Optics (AAO) Building. Supplied

University science education is being disrupted by changes in technology, including AI, and by changes in student and employer expectations.

Training versus education

A key part of evolving the Bachelor of Science (BSc) is navigating the balance between vocational training and broader education, according to Brian Yates, emeritus professor at the University of Tasmania and ACDS executive member. While training equips students with job-specific skills for a smooth transition into the workforce, education in a research-led environment fosters more adaptable capabilities like problem-solving and teamwork.

At the moment, Yates sees a strong focus on producing “job-ready” graduates, with curricula packed with industry-relevant knowledge. However, as specialised information becomes
more accessible, he suggests the emphasis might shift from “having knowledge” to developing the skills needed to find and apply it.

Professor Ingo Koeper, Flinders
University, with students

It’s a view that Professor Ingo Koeper, associate dean of learning and teaching at Flinders University shares, in part.

“I think we need both. We need a solid understanding of foundation in the discipline, but then you have to be able to extrapolate or take that and apply it to various different concepts,” he says.

Job-ready graduates

The problem that Koeper identifies is that science graduates don’t all follow the same career trajectories. Some go into academic research, some go into commercial science, some wind up in unexpected places, such as banking, “because they have critical thinking and analytical brains”.

Therefore he says teaching “job-ready” is a balance
between vocational knowledge and transferable skills.
He believes the BSc of the future could dispense with traditional lectures and move to online or face-to-face workshops, supplemented by in-person practical classes where students can gain hands-on experience in their
chosen discipline of science.

Workshops are a more active form of learning, says Koeper, but they come with a cost. Mass lectures are a financially efficient way of teaching lots of students and are well-suited to identifying important information. More active forms of learning take up more lecturer resources. But the move from mass lectures also opens opportunities.

Personalised learning

Victoria University (VU) has embraced the new hybrid-learning environment with a trial of a new assessment protocol. In recent years VU developed the Block Model, where subjects are run for a four-week intensive block, and students are enrolled in only one subject at a time, so they concentrate and consolidate their learning in one area. Joshua Johnson, chair of the Assessment Taskforce, says that the new “two-lane” assessment embraces AI-assisted learning in the open assessments lane. But in the secure assessments lane, the focus is on practical skills.

“For science education specifically, this includes hands-on experimental work, live data analysis and real-time scientific communication,” he says. Johnson says the framework strikes
a balance between collaborative, hands-on learning essential to science while preparing students for a workforce where technological fluency is paramount.

Macquarie University in Sydney is putting the finishing touches on its new Engineering and Australian Astronomical Optics (AAO) Building.

The $150 million facility – due to be officially opened around February 2026 – will house AAO which designs instrumentation and software for the world’s largest telescopes.

“Students will be going to classes there, but they’ll be walking past a group of professionals that are building an instrument that’s going to go for an international client on a giant telescope in Chile,” says director of the AAO and acting dean of engineering, Richard McDermid.

“I think that it’s great for the students to get exposure to
how professional work happens.” McDermid speculates that the defining feature of the future BSc might be personalised learning, with students able to mix and match their skills or knowledge acquisition, tailored to their personal career trajectory.

Multiple self-directed online units might be pre-prepared so that students can gain relevant skills while the impost on
teaching resources is minimised.

In this vision of the future, practical experience with industry professionals, such as that offered in the new AAO building will be essential. McDermid says students should graduate feeling like they didn’t just spend three years getting information they could have looked up online, but come out feeling that they understand how their potential industries work, because they’ve had experience in them.

“So they stand in an interview situation and talk from experience rather than theory,” he says.

But Macquarie’s edifice is being completed at a time when universities are increasingly exploring the advantages of online learning. The question now is what lessons science schools can take from Macquarie’s engineering co-location project, what a BSc will look like, and whether facilities like the AAO building will be required as we transition to the future.

Written by Sara Phillips

First published in Australian University Science issue 14

Is commercialisation the dark side?

As an avid Star Wars fan I’d like to explore the topic of research commercialisation using terms that a Jedi Knight would recognise.

The Federal Government is seeking a better return on its sizeable investment in research through:

  • better commercialisation of research
  • more engagement between researchers and industry, and
  • changing the requirements for funding for research institutions and the incentives for researchers.

To some, this push for a more commercial and applied approach to research is like the Emperor urging Luke Skywalker to embrace the dark side of the force.

Like a Jedi apprentice, I began my science degree because of my love of science and desire to make a difference. I was not interested in doing a business degree or any degree that would purely maximise my salary prospects.

I chose an honours project close to my heart, involving ‘cis-platinum’ chemotherapy for breast cancer, with which my aunt had been recently diagnosed. Unfortunately the project was given to a student who was less passionate about it, but had a higher grade point average than me.

I was forced to find an alternative project. Seeking something with a practical application, I changed universities and chose a project sponsored by a company seeking a solution to a problem. My honours thesis titled ‘The wettability of rough surfaces’ looked at why roughening a surface could make it more hydrophobic for practical applications in non-stick surfaces.

When I started work at ANSTO, in a role that was half research and half business development, I was tasked with creating a spin-off business involving one of the research instruments.

As I was introduced to other research staff, a term came up that I was familiar with, but not in a work context. Some researchers referred to me as having moved to the “dark side”.  This was said as a joke, but it stemmed from an underlying belief that anyone associated with commercialisation, or engaging with industry regularly, was doing something wrong.

The implication was that there was something suspect about me for being involved in this type of activity, ‘tainted’ by commerce.

Being older and – I’d like to think – somewhat wiser, I now reflect that, had I continued along the pathway of medical research into breast cancer, perhaps I would have made an amazing discovery that could have saved many lives. But for my research to result in a cure would require the involvement of commercialisation experts – the kind of person I have become.

Between a cancer research discovery and a cured patient lies the long and arduous process of commercialisation which requires a team-based approach, where research and commercial staff work collaboratively.

I know now that being responsible for industry engagement, or commercialisation of a project rather than the research, does not mean my work is any less important, pure or noble. I’m using my strongest skills in the best way to have a positive impact for humanity, in my own way.

Commercialisation experts are not the Sith, we bring balance to the force by forging new Australian industries and actively training young researchers in the ways of industry, for research alone cannot achieve a better future.

I believe commercialisation is not the Dark Side, it is A New Hope.

– Natalie Chapman, Managing Director, gemaker

commercialisation

Natalie Chapman is a commercialisation and marketing expert with more than 15 years of experience turning innovative ideas and technologies into thriving businesses.

She co-founded her company gemaker in 2011 after almost a decade leading business development and marketing projects at ANSTO and, in 2013, won a Stevie Award for Female Entrepreneur of the Year in Asia, Australia and New Zealand.

Natalie specialises in mining, new materials, environmental and ICT technologies. She takes technologies from research through to start-up, assisting her clients with commercialisation strategy, building licensing revenue, securing funding grants, tenders and engaging with industry.

Natalie also heads corporate communications at ASX-listed mining and exploration company Alkane Resources and is responsible for attracting investment, government relations and marketing communications.

Natalie has a Bachelor of Science with honours (Chemistry) from the University of New South Wales and a Master of Business Administration (Marketing) from the University of Wollongong.